REF Advice Notes 3: What will Hefce count as ‘under-pinning’ research?
Dunleavy, P.
& Tinkler, J.
(2012).
REF Advice Notes 3: What will Hefce count as ‘under-pinning’ research?
Many possible Impact Cases are likely to raise issues about whether they are sufficiently grounded on what the REF audit Panels can recognize as ‘2* research’. The Funding Council’s overly restrictive ‘physical science’ view of how research influences policy has created an artificial minefield of pointless obstacles. However, Jane Tinkler and Patrick Dunleavy show how with skill and persistence, departments can navigate successfully past these dangers.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2012 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0 |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 05 Apr 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/72479 |
Explore Further
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2650-6398
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5306-3940