Perceptions and ‘impacts’ of the REF: Key aim for next round should be to explore apprehension and minimise anxieties.
Sage, Daniel; and Murphy, Tony
(2014)
Perceptions and ‘impacts’ of the REF: Key aim for next round should be to explore apprehension and minimise anxieties.
[Online resource]
Discussions around the REF have tended to be negative, but academics appear to have experienced the framework in a number of different ways. To understand the variety of themes and important issues, Tony Murphy and Daniel Sage undertook a media analysis that points to the range of concerns academics have around the REF and its processes. They argue there is much that can be learned for future assessment exercises and it is ever-more important that we get it right when thinking about ‘impact’ in research and the pressures academics face.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 30 Mar 2017 10:36 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/71657 |
Downloads