Opposition to impact criteria stems from disciplines wanting to retain their own systems of quality control and their distinctive identities
Adams, J.
(2011).
Opposition to impact criteria stems from disciplines wanting to retain their own systems of quality control and their distinctive identities.
The inclusion of impact measurement in the 2014 REF has generated anxiety and unease for academics, especially those in the humanities. This anxiety is connected to the university’s need to preserve disciplinary autonomy writes Jon Adams, who considers how impact passes a crucial element of control out of the hands of the departments, and into the hands of the public.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2011 The Author |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 22 Aug 2013 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/51843 |