Peer review should not be such a dominant process in determining research funding allocation, RAND argues
Blog Admin, Impact of Social Sciences
(2011).
Peer review should not be such a dominant process in determining research funding allocation, RAND argues.
Peer review is not always the best methodology for research funding processes, and diverse strategies should be used, according to a report by policy research organisation RAND Europe.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2011 Impact of Social Sciences |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 22 Aug 2013 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/51823 |