How polycentric is a monocentric city?: centers, spillovers and hysteresis

Ahlfeldt, G. M.ORCID logo & Wendland, N. (2013). How polycentric is a monocentric city?: centers, spillovers and hysteresis. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(1), 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs013
Copy

We assess the extent to which firms in an environment of decreasing transport costs and industrial transformation value the benefits of proximity to a historic CBD and agglomeration economies in their location decisions. Taking a hybrid perspective of classical bid-rent theory and a world where clustering of economic activity is driven by between-firm spillovers, Berlin, Germany, from 1890 to 1936 serves as a case in point. Our results suggest that the average productivity effect of a doubling of between- firm spillovers over the study period increases from 3.5% to 8.3%. As the city transforms into a service-based economy, several micro agglomerations emerge. Their locations close to the CBD still make the city look roughly monocentric. This is in line with a hysteresis effect in which second-nature geography drives the ongoing strength of a historic city center even though the importance of the originally relevant first-nature geography has vanished.

picture_as_pdf

subject
Accepted Version

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export