Thinking about God encourages intergroup prosociality even when conflict is salient

Pasek, Michael H.; Lehner, Anne; Hartley, Starlett; Yul Kwon, Jung; Roselyn Mokosoi Israel, Adiama; Wati, Reshmi; and Ginges, JeremyORCID logo Thinking about God encourages intergroup prosociality even when conflict is salient. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. ISSN 1368-4302
Copy

Recent research documents that thinking about God encourages intergroup prosociality among believers. An open question is whether such increased prosociality is dampened by intergroup conflict. We conducted preregistered field experiments with two ethno-religious populations in Fiji: indigenous Christian iTaukei ( N = 324) and Hindu Indo-Fijians ( N = 280). In each study, we manipulated (between-person) whether participants thought about intergroup conflict before completing a dictator game in which we manipulated (within-person) whether participants thought about God’s preferences when allocating real money to an outgroup member. Although participants who reflected on intergroup conflict gave less money away to outgroup members, thinking about God led to significant and comparable increases in intergroup prosociality regardless of whether participants thought about conflict. Results challenge widely-held assumptions about the role of religious belief in intergroup conflict and raise questions about mechanisms that are often theorized to explain the spread of religious beliefs themselves.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation METS MODS RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads