Items where Subject is "Q Science"

Library of Congress subjects (102130) Q Science (4994) Q Science (General) (822) QA Mathematics (3525) QB Astronomy (9) QC Physics (342) QD Chemistry (16) QE Geology (11) QH Natural history (215) QK Botany (7) QL Zoology (87) QM Human anatomy (6) QP Physiology (22) QR Microbiology (42)
Number of items at this level: 38.
2025
  • Heesen, Remco, Bright, Liam Kofi (2025). Publication bias is bad for science if not necessarily scientists. Royal Society Open Science, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240688 picture_as_pdf
  • Krauss, Alexander (2025). New scientific fields are triggered by powerful new methods. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05797-6 picture_as_pdf
    • 2024
  • Krauss, Alexander (2024). Redefining the scientific method: as the use of sophisticated scientific methods that extend our mind. PNAS Nexus, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae112 picture_as_pdf
  • Krauss, Alexander (2024). Science of science: a multidisciplinary field studying science. Heliyon, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36066 picture_as_pdf
  • Lietz, Haiko, Jadidi, Mohsen, Kostic, Daniel, Tsvetkova, Milena, Wagner, Claudia (2024). Individual and gender inequality in computer science: a career study of cohorts from 1970 to 2000. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(1), 128 - 152. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00283 picture_as_pdf
  • Schneider, Mike D., Sogbanmu, Temitope O., Rubin, Hannah, Bortolus, Alejandro, Chukwu, Emelda E., Heesen, Remco, Hewitt, Chad L., Kaufer, Ricardo, Metzen, Hanna & Mitova, Veli et al (2024). Science–policy research collaborations need philosophers. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(6), 1001 - 1002. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01892-x picture_as_pdf
  • Sturgis, Patrick, Brunton-Smith, Ian, Allum, Nick, Fuglsang, Simon (2024). Testing the cultural-invariance hypothesis: a global analysis of the relationship between scientific knowledge and attitudes to science. PLOS ONE, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296860 picture_as_pdf
  • Wu, Jingyi (2024). Better than best: epistemic landscapes and diversity of practice in science. Philosophy of Science, 91(5), 1189 - 1198. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.129 picture_as_pdf
  • Yu, Haohan, Ma, Qiaochu, Sun, Yao, Jiang, Shan, Hu, Songhan, Wang, Xin (2024). Analyzing the effects of physical activity levels on aggressive behavior in college students using a chain-mediated model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), p. 5795. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55534-3 picture_as_pdf
    • 2023
  • Dickins, T. E., Dickins, Benjamin J. A. (Eds.) (2023). Evolutionary biology: contemporary and historical reflections upon core theory. Springer Nature (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9
  • Arden, Rosalind, Abdellaoui, A., Li, Qian, Zheng, Yao, Wang, Dengfeng, Su, Yanjie (2023). Majestic tigers: personality structure in the great Amur cat. Royal Society Open Science, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220957 picture_as_pdf
  • Azoulay, Pierre, Qiu, Shumin, Steinwender, Claudia (2023). Who stands on the shoulders of Chinese (scientific) giants? Evidence from chemistry. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1904). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Boumans, Marcel, Morgan, Mary S. (2023). Do you see it this way? Visualising as a tool of sense-making. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 101, 30 - 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.08.007 picture_as_pdf
  • Entradas, Marta, Marcinkowski, Frank, Bauer, Martin W., Pellegrini, Giuseppe (2023). University central offices are moving away from doing towards facilitating science communication: a European cross-comparison. PLOS ONE, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290504 picture_as_pdf
  • Harper, Gavin D.J., Kendrick, Emma, Anderson, Paul A., Mrozik, Wojciech, Christensen, Paul, Lambert, Simon, Greenwood, David, Das, Prodip K., Ahmeid, Mohamed & Milojevic, Zoran et al (2023). Roadmap for a sustainable circular economy in lithium-ion and future battery technologies. JPhys Energy, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7655/acaa57 picture_as_pdf
  • Krauss, Alexander (2023). Homo methodologicus and the origin of science and civilisation. Heliyon, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20237 picture_as_pdf
  • Wu, Jingyi, Weatherall, James Owen (2023). Between a stone and a Hausdorff space. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, https://doi.org/10.1086/728532 picture_as_pdf
  • Wu, Qianxin, Wu, Junjing, Abdul Karim, Muhammad Kaiser, Chen, Xi, Wang, Tengyao, Iwama, Sho, Carobbio, Stefania, Keen, Peter, Vidal-Puig, Antonio & Kotter, Mark R. et al (2023). Massively parallel characterization of CRISPR activator efficacy in human induced pluripotent stem cells and neurons. Molecular Cell, 83(7), 1125 - 1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2023.02.011 picture_as_pdf
    • 2022
  • Gibbons, Matilda, Crump, Andrew, Barrett, Meghan, Sarlak, Sajedeh, Birch, Jonathan, Chittka, Lars (2022). Can insects feel pain? A review of the neural and behavioural evidence. In Jurenka, Russell (Ed.), Advances in Insect Physiology (pp. 155-229). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiip.2022.10.001
  • Horbach, Serge P.J.M., Bouter, Lex M., Gaskell, George, Hiney, Maura, Kavouras, Panagiotis, Mejlgaard, Niels, Allum, Nick, Aubert Bonn, Noémie, Bendtsen, Anna Kathrine & Charitidis, Costas A. et al (2022). Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: recommendations for research funders. PLoS Biology, 20(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001773 picture_as_pdf
  • Hua, Chenquan, Wu, Bingxuan, Li, Bin, Hua, Xuanye, Geng, Yanfeng (2022). A pressure pulse recognition method based on flow-adaptive double threshold for pressure pulse telemetry. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111158
  • Kotzé, Louis j., Kim, Rakhyun e., Blanchard, Catherine, Gellers, Joshua c., Holley, Cameron, Petersmann, Marie, Van asselt, Harro, Biermann, Frank, Hurlbert, Margot (2022). Earth system law: exploring new frontiers in legal science. Earth System Governance, 11, p. 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100126 picture_as_pdf
  • McKee, Martin, Altmann, Danny, Costello, Anthony, Friston, Karl, Haque, Zubaida, Khunti, Kamlesh, Michie, Susan, Oni, Tolullah, Pagel, Christina & Pillay, Deenan et al (2022). Open science communication: The first year of the UK's Independent Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies. Health Policy, 126(3), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.006 picture_as_pdf
  • Olšáková, Doubravka, Robinson, Sam (6 May 2022) Global conflict and the rise of 'post naïve' science diplomacy. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
    • 2021
  • Güttinger, Stephan (2021). Covid-19 and the need for more history and philosophy of RNA. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00391-w picture_as_pdf
    • 2020
  • Francis, Andrew R., Wynn, Henry P. (2020). A mean first passage time genome rearrangement distance. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 80(6), 1971-1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-020-01487-w
  • Galizzi, Matteo M., Rinke, Eike Mark, McGarrigle, Ronan, Lynott, Dermot, Lunny, Carole, Lautarescu, Alexandra, Farran, Emily K., Crook, Zander, Stewart, Suzanne L.K. (2020). Pre-registration and registered reports: a primer from UKRN. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8v2n7 picture_as_pdf
  • Galizzi, Matteo M., Rumsey, Sally, Spitschan, Manuel, Jaquiery, Matt (2020). Preprints: a primer from UKRN. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/m4zyh picture_as_pdf
  • Ledgerwood, Emmeline (22 July 2020) STEMM in Parliament: what oral history tells us about MPs and science. British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Mehryar, Sara, Schwarz, Nina, Sliuzas, Richard, van Maarseveen, Martin (2020). Making use of fuzzy cognitive maps in agent-based modeling. In Verhagen, Harko, Borit, Melania, Bravo, Giangiacomo, Wijermans, Nanda (Eds.), Advances in Social Simulation: Looking in the Mirror, 2018 (pp. 307 - 313). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_29 picture_as_pdf
  • Mehryar, Sara, Sliuzas, Richard, Schwarz, Nina, van Maarseveen, Martin (2020). Policy option simulation in socio-ecological systems. In Verhagen, Harko, Borit, Melania, Bravo, Giangiacomo, Wijermans, Nanda (Eds.), Advances in Social Simulation: Looking in the Mirror, 2018 (pp. 315 - 320). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_30 picture_as_pdf
  • Vincent, Katharine, Archer, Emma, Henriksson, Rebecka, Pardoe, Joanna, Mittal, Neha (2020). Reflections on a key component of co-producing climate services: defining climate metrics from user needs. Climate Services, 20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100204 picture_as_pdf
    • 2019
  • Carter, Laura (1 December 2019) Book review: the costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism by Nick Couldry and Ulises A. Mejias. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Dewar, Neil, Fletcher, Samuel C., Hudetz, Laurenz (2019). Extending List’s levels. In Kus, Marek, Skowron, Bartlomiej, Kus, Marek (Eds.), Category Theory in Physics, Mathematics, and Philosophy (pp. 63-81). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30896-4_6 picture_as_pdf
  • Fanelli, Daniele (2019). A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge. Royal Society Open Science, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181055 picture_as_pdf
  • Siddaway, Andy P., Wood, Alex M., Hedges, Larry V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
    • 2013
  • Stoneman, Paul, Sturgis, Patrick, Allum, Nick (2013). Exploring public discourses about emerging technologies through statistical clustering of open-ended survey questions. Public Understanding of Science, 22(7), 850-868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512441569
    • 2010
  • Sturgis, Patrick, Brunton-Smith, Ian, Fife-Schaw, Chris (2010). Public attitudes to genomic science: An experiment in information provision. Public Understanding of Science, 19(2), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508093371