'Britzerland': the problem of dispute resolution post-Brexit

Both the UK and Switzerland are trying to negotiate a dispute resolution mechanism that would give the European Court of Justice the final word on the interpretation of EU law. Carl Baudenbacher (Monckton Chambers and former president of the EFTA Court) looks at the inspiration for this arrangement - the EU-Ukraine Agreement - and explains why it is a totally unsuitable framework for both the UK and Switzerland. He argues that the EFTA Court would be a far better place to resolve disputes.