Interactive justice, the boundary problem, and proportionality
Valentini, L.
(2018).
Interactive justice, the boundary problem, and proportionality.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2018.1481610
In Interactive Justice, Emanuela Ceva argues that the parties to an intractable value conflict should each be given an equal substantive right to a hearing. I suggest that Ceva’s account gives insufficient attention to the question of who counts as a party to a value conflict. Once more attention to this question is given, her defence of an equal right to a hearing may be put into question.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2018 Informa UK Limited |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Government |
| DOI | 10.1080/13698230.2018.1481610 |
| Date Deposited | 20 Jul 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | 02 Jan 2018 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/89376 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85048807365 (Scopus publication)
- https://tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/current (Official URL)