Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform
Bai, James; and Hobbs, Harry
(2017)
Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform.
Alternative Law Journal, 42 (4).
pp. 286-291.
ISSN 1037-969X
Throughout 2016, Attorney-General George Brandis QC repeatedly denied he intended to leave the Federal Parliament and take up a position on the High Court of Australia. In this article we explore the experiences of the two most recent politicians-cum-High Court Justices: Garfield Barwick and Lionel Murphy; and note that Australia’s current judicial appointment process would have permitted Brandis to make a similar transition. We argue that this process should be revamped to enhance transparency and accountability in the appointments process, to the benefit of our judicial system and its public perception.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords | judicial appointments,politicians,High Court,Barwick,Murphy,Brandis |
| Departments | Law School |
| DOI | 10.1177/1037969X17732707 |
| Date Deposited | 21 Feb 2018 10:29 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/86816 |