Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform
Bai, J. & Hobbs, H.
(2017).
Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform.
Alternative Law Journal,
42(4), 286-291.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X17732707
Throughout 2016, Attorney-General George Brandis QC repeatedly denied he intended to leave the Federal Parliament and take up a position on the High Court of Australia. In this article we explore the experiences of the two most recent politicians-cum-High Court Justices: Garfield Barwick and Lionel Murphy; and note that Australia’s current judicial appointment process would have permitted Brandis to make a similar transition. We argue that this process should be revamped to enhance transparency and accountability in the appointments process, to the benefit of our judicial system and its public perception.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2017 The Authors |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Law School |
| DOI | 10.1177/1037969X17732707 |
| Date Deposited | 21 Feb 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | 26 Jan 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/86816 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85036565058 (Scopus publication)
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/alj (Official URL)