Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform

Bai, J. & Hobbs, H. (2017). Appointing Attorneys-General to the High Court: a case for reform. Alternative Law Journal, 42(4), 286-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X17732707
Copy

Throughout 2016, Attorney-General George Brandis QC repeatedly denied he intended to leave the Federal Parliament and take up a position on the High Court of Australia. In this article we explore the experiences of the two most recent politicians-cum-High Court Justices: Garfield Barwick and Lionel Murphy; and note that Australia’s current judicial appointment process would have permitted Brandis to make a similar transition. We argue that this process should be revamped to enhance transparency and accountability in the appointments process, to the benefit of our judicial system and its public perception.

picture_as_pdf

subject
Accepted Version

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export