Fiscal unions redux
Before the advent of sophisticated international Önancial markets, a widely accepted belief was that within a monetary union, a union-wide authority orchestrating Öscal transfers between countries is necessary to provide adequate insurance against country-speciÖc economic áuctuations. A natural question is then: Do sophisticated international Önancial markets obviate the need for such an active union-wide authority? We argue that they do. SpeciÖcally, we show that in a benchmark economy with no international Önancial markets, an activist union-wide authority is necessary to achieve desirable outcomes. With sophisticated Önancial markets, however, such an authority is unnecessary if its only goal is to provide cross-country insurance. Since restricting the set of policy instruments available to member countries does not create a Öscal externality across them, this result holds in a wide variety of settings. Finally, we establish that an activist union-wide authority concerned just with providing insurance across member countries is optimal only when individual countries are either unable or unwilling to pursue desirable policies.
| Item Type | Working paper |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2017 The Authors |
| Departments | LSE > Research Centres > Centre for Macroeconomics |
| Date Deposited | 12 Dec 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/86162 |
Explore Further
- E60 - General
- E61 - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
- F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
- F35 - Foreign Aid
- F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission
- G15 - International Financial Markets
- G28 - Government Policy and Regulation
- G33 - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
- http://www.centreformacroeconomics.ac.uk/Discussion-Papers/2017/CFMDP2017-12-Paper.pdf (Publisher)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85011711437 (Scopus publication)
- http://www.centreformacroeconomics.ac.uk/Home.aspx (Official URL)