Choice deferral, indecisiveness and preference for flexibility
In a standard model of menu choice, we examine the behavior of an agent who applies the following Cautious Deferral rule: “Whenever in doubt, don't commit; just leave options open.” Our primitive is a complete preference relation ≽ that represents the agent's choice behavior. The agent's indecisiveness is captured by means of a possibly incomplete (but otherwise rational) preference relation ≽ˆ. We ask when ≽ can be viewed as a Cautious Deferral completion of some incomplete ≽ˆ. Under the independence and continuity assumptions commonly used in the menu choice literature, we find that even the smallest amount of indecisiveness is enough to force ≽, through the above deferral rule, to exhibit preference for flexibility on its entire domain. Thus we highlight a fundamental tension between non-monotonic preferences, such as preferences for self-control, and tendency to defer choice due to indecisiveness.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2017 Elsevier |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Social Policy |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jet.2017.05.001 |
| Date Deposited | 18 Jul 2017 |
| Acceptance Date | 05 May 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/83566 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020692875 (Scopus publication)
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-econo... (Official URL)