Merit vs Equality? The argument that gender quotas violate meritocracy is based on fallacies

Murray, R. (2015). Merit vs Equality? The argument that gender quotas violate meritocracy is based on fallacies.
Copy

The case against gender quotas often involves the argument of merit. The logic is that we should recruit on the basis of merit, not gender; quotas recruit on the basis of gender and so are by definition unmeritocratic. This is a myth used to justify the privilege-based status quo, argues Rainbow Murray. By focusing on political recruitment, she explains why merit and quotas are not mutually exclusive but that in fact, quotas are essential to a meritocratic system for they open up politics to everyone.

picture_as_pdf

subject
Published Version

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export