Merit vs Equality? The argument that gender quotas violate meritocracy is based on fallacies
Murray, Rainbow
(2015)
Merit vs Equality? The argument that gender quotas violate meritocracy is based on fallacies.
[Online resource]
The case against gender quotas often involves the argument of merit. The logic is that we should recruit on the basis of merit, not gender; quotas recruit on the basis of gender and so are by definition unmeritocratic. This is a myth used to justify the privilege-based status quo, argues Rainbow Murray. By focusing on political recruitment, she explains why merit and quotas are not mutually exclusive but that in fact, quotas are essential to a meritocratic system for they open up politics to everyone.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 12 Apr 2017 13:24 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/73664 |
Downloads