Social media is inherently a system of peer evaluation and is changing the way scholars disseminate their research, raising questions about the way we evaluate academic authority
Hermida, A.
(2011).
Social media is inherently a system of peer evaluation and is changing the way scholars disseminate their research, raising questions about the way we evaluate academic authority.
Continuing with our focus on the merits of social media for making academic impact, Alfred Hermida, award-winning online news pioneer, digital media scholar and journalism educator, argues that social media is inherently a system of peer evaluation, where participation and engagement are recognised and rewarded through dynamic social interactions.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2011 The Author(s) CC BY 3.0 |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 06 Apr 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/72753 |
Explore Further
- http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2011/06/27/social-media-is-inherently-a-system-of-peer-evaluation-and-is-changing-the-way-scholars-disseminate-their-research-raising-questions-about-the-way-we-evaluate-academic-authority/ (Publisher)
- http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences (Official URL)