Putin’s intervention in Crimea has effectively marginalised his domestic opposition in Russia
March, L.
(2014).
Putin’s intervention in Crimea has effectively marginalised his domestic opposition in Russia.
What has the impact of the crisis in Crimea been on Vladimir Putin’s domestic political situation? Luke March writes that there has always been a clear distinction between ‘systemic’ opposition parties, who are tolerated by the Kremlin, and ‘non-systemic’ opposition movements, which have little access to the media or state funding. He argues that the net effect of the situation in Crimea has been to marginalise these non-systemic groups and bolster public support for Vladimir Putin’s regime, although it remains to be seen how lasting this effect will be.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2014 The Author(s) |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 03 Apr 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/72050 |