The American paradox:ideology of free markets and the hidden practice of directional thrust
The USA presents a paradox. The US state has practised production-focused industrial policy from the early years of the republic, with benefits that by any plausible measure far exceed costs. But since the 1980s, the exchange-focused idea that ‘the free market is what works, and having the state help it is usually a contradiction in terms’ has been at the normative centre of gravity in public policy discourse. With ‘industrial policy’ rendered toxic, the state has disguised its production-focused practice, to the point where even non-ideological academic researchers claim that the USA does industrial policy not at all, or badly. This essay reviews the history of US industrial policy, with an emphasis on ‘network-building industrial policy’ over the past two decades. At the end, it draws a lesson for policy communities in other countries and interstate development organisations such as the World Bank and IMF.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords | industrial policy,US developmental state,networks,varieties of capitalism,leading the market,following the market |
| Departments | International Development |
| DOI | 10.1093/cje/bew064 |
| Date Deposited | 09 Mar 2017 14:51 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/69765 |