Taxes on bottled water are better at raising money than reducing litter
Stevens, A.
(2016).
Taxes on bottled water are better at raising money than reducing litter.
With environmental concerns on the rise, many US states have introduced policies to reduce waste, including taxes on packaging. In new research using a case study of the introduction of a bottled water tax in Washington State, Andrew Stevens finds that such taxes have far less of an impact than was originally expected. For an average tax increase of 9 percent, consumers only reduced consumption of bottled water by 6 percent. Other policies, such as deposit and refund systems, he writes, are far more effective in reducing plastic bottle waste and litter.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2016 The Authors, USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science © CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 10 Feb 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/69316 |