Why some tribal governments are more likely to partner with state and local law enforcement than others.
Conner, T. W. & Witt, S. L.
(2016).
Why some tribal governments are more likely to partner with state and local law enforcement than others.
In many respects, Indian lands in the US can be considered to be a country within a country. With many tribal governments having their own law enforcement agencies there is a risk of jurisdictional conflict with agencies outside of Indian Country. Thaddieus W. Conner and Stephanie L. Witt take a close look at cross-deputization agreements between law enforcement agencies which allow officers from tribal, state, and local agencies to actively respond to issues regardless of jurisdictional boundaries. They find that the major determinants of such cooperation are the presence of Indian gaming, higher rates of violent crime, as well as organizational resources and capacity.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2016 The Authors, USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science © CC BY-NC 3.0 |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 09 Feb 2017 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/69265 |
