Pareto models, top incomes, and recent trends in UK income inequality
I determine UK income inequality levels and trends by combining inequality estimates from tax return data (for the ‘rich’) and household survey data (for the ‘non-rich’), taking advantage of the better coverage of top incomes in tax return data (which I demonstrate) and creating income variables in the survey data with the same definitions as in the tax data to enhance comparability. For top income recipients, I estimate inequality and mean income by fitting Pareto models to the tax data, examining specification issues in depth, notably whether to use Pareto I or Pareto II (generalised Pareto) models, and the choice of income threshold above which the Pareto models apply. The preferred specification is a Pareto II model with a threshold set at the 99th or 95th percentile (depending on year). Conclusions about aggregate UK inequality trends since the mid-1990s are robust to the way in which tax data are employed. The Gini coefficient for gross individual income rose by around 7% or 8% between 1996/97 and 2007/08, with most of the increase occurring after 2003/04. The corresponding estimate based wholly on the survey data is around –5%.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2016 The London School of Economics and Political Science |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Social Policy |
| DOI | 10.1111/ecca.12217 |
| Date Deposited | 09 Sep 2016 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/67667 |
Explore Further
- C46 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Specific Distributions
- C81 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data
- D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/social-policy/people/academic-staff/Professor-Stephen-Jenkins.aspx (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85008256435 (Scopus publication)
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ (Official URL)