The perverse consequences of policy restrictions in the presence of asymmetric information

Hortala-Vallve, R.ORCID logo & Larcinese, V.ORCID logo (2017). The perverse consequences of policy restrictions in the presence of asymmetric information. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(3), 411 - 425. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.30
Copy

Institutions have the power to limit a government’s policy options. Policy restrictions are often used as solutions to coordination failures or time inconsistency problems. However, policy constraints can have significant drawbacks and these disadvantages have, to date, been overlooked in the literature. When institutional constraints tie a government’s hands, citizens will have less incentive to become informed about politics and participate in collective decision-making. This is because policy restrictions lower the private returns of political information. A fiscal policy restriction, for example, may decrease redistribution by lowering a poorer voters’ acquisition of political information. We illustrate our theoretical findings with numerical simulations and find that in one in three cases these policy restrictions make poorer voters worse off.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Hortala-Vallve_Policy_Restrictions_author.pdf
subject
Accepted Version

Download
picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Hortala_Vallve_Policy_Restrictions_appendix_author.pdf

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export