Conference rage: how did something as truly awful as paneldiscussions become the default format?
Green, Duncan
(2016)
Conference rage: how did something as truly awful as paneldiscussions become the default format?
[Online resource]
The relatively low impact of many academic conferences suggests it may be time for a rethink, argues Duncan Green. ‘Manels’ (male only panels) are an outrage, but why not go for complete abolition, rather than mere gender balance? With people reading out papers, terrible powerpoints crammed with too many words, or illegible graphics, it is time for innovation in format. We need to get better at shaping the format to fit the the precise purpose of the conference.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 21 Jul 2016 09:47 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/67197 |
