Fundable, but not funded: how can research funders ensure ‘unlucky’ applications are handled more appropriately?
Preston, O.
(2016).
Fundable, but not funded: how can research funders ensure ‘unlucky’ applications are handled more appropriately?
Having a funding application rejected does not necessarily mean the research is unsupportable by funders – maybe just unlucky. There is a significant risk to wider society in the rejection of unlucky but otherwise sound applications: good ideas may slip through the cracks, or be re-worked and dulled-down to sound more likely to provide reliable results. Oli Preston looks at how funders could be better at addressing the burden of more high-quality applications than are financially manageable.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2016 LSE Impact of Social Sciences © CC BY 3.0 |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 31 May 2016 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/66703 |