Are there differences in responses to social identity questions in face-to-face versus telephone interviews? Results of an experiment on a longitudinal survey
This paper investigates the effect of interview mode (telephone versus face-to-face) on responses to a 13-item module of identity questions covering distinct domains. With increasing moves towards mixed-mode implementation, especially in longitudinal surveys, establishing whether mode effects are likely to influence findings is of practical value. A growing number of studies explore mode effects; but the potential impact of mode on identity questions has not been investigated, even though such questions are increasingly being asked in multi-topic surveys. Adjusting for selection, we find little evidence for specific mode effects. The exception is responses on political identity: telephone responders are eight percentage points more likely to consider politics important to their identity. We do not find differences in data quality as measured by item non-response, straightlining, primacy and recency effects across modes. We conclude that mode effects are small for identity questions.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2016 The Authors |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Social Policy |
| DOI | 10.1080/13645579.2016.1165495 |
| Date Deposited | 01 Apr 2016 |
| Acceptance Date | 10 Mar 2016 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/65866 |
Explore Further
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/social-policy/people/academic-staff/Professor-Lucinda-Platt.aspx (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84969234299 (Scopus publication)
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tsrm20 (Official URL)
