Responsibility, culpability and the sentencing of mentally disordered offenders: objectives in conflict

Peay, J. (2016). Responsibility, culpability and the sentencing of mentally disordered offenders: objectives in conflict. Criminal Law Review, (3), 152-164.
Copy

Discusses the challenges and conflicting goals facing courts and psychiatrists when assessing the culpability of mentally disordered offenders for sentencing purposes, with reference to the Court of Appeal ruling in R. v Vowles (Lucinda). Examines the distinction between legal responsibility and culpability, the difficulties facing psychiatrists involved in decisions about punishment, and the role of orders under the Mental Health Act 1983 s.45A.

picture_as_pdf

subject
Accepted Version

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export