Open/closed list and party choice: experimental evidence from the UK
Which parties benefit from open-list (as opposed to closed-list) proportional representation elections? This article shows that a move from closed-list to open-list competition is likely to be more favorable to parties with more internal disagreement on salient issues; this is because voters who might have voted for a unified party under closed lists may be drawn to specific candidates within internally divided parties under open lists. The study provides experimental evidence of this phenomenon in a hypothetical European Parliament election in the UK, in which using an open-list ballot would shift support from UKIP (the Eurosceptic party) to Eurosceptic candidates of the Conservative Party. The findings suggest that open-list ballots could restrict support for parties that primarily mobilize on a single issue.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2016 Cambridge University Press |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Government |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0007123415000629 |
| Date Deposited | 17 Jun 2015 |
| Acceptance Date | 2015 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/62331 |
Explore Further
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/people/academic-staff/simon-hix/home.aspx (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84973902113 (Scopus publication)
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna... (Official URL)
- Blumenau, J., Hangartner, D., Hix, S. & Eggers, A. C. (2016). Replication Data for: Open/Closed List and Party Choice: Experimental Evidence from the U.K. [Dataset]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/bghlax