R. and JUSTICE (intervening) (on the application of Corner House Research and Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, ex parte BAE Systems plc, Appeal judgment, [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756, [2008] Lloyd's Rep FC 537, [2008] 4 All ER 927, [2008] 3 WLR 568, [2009] Crim LR 46, ILDC 957 (UK 2008), 30th July 2008, House of Lords [HL]
Thomas, Chris
(2008)
R. and JUSTICE (intervening) (on the application of Corner House Research and Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, ex parte BAE Systems plc, Appeal judgment, [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756, [2008] Lloyd's Rep FC 537, [2008] 4 All ER 927, [2008] 3 WLR 568, [2009] Crim LR 46, ILDC 957 (UK 2008), 30th July 2008, House of Lords [HL]
Oxford Reports on International Law, 1 (AC 756).
Whether the House of Lords should interpret Article 5 of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions to determine whether the Director of the Serious Fraud Office—in claiming to act in accordance with that provision when making the decision to discontinue a bribery investigation—had unlawfully misdirected himself.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Departments | Law School |
| Date Deposited | 07 Oct 2014 16:07 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/59649 |