The proposition 8 definition of “marriage” was misguided and led to its demise
Gibson, Kyle
(2014)
The proposition 8 definition of “marriage” was misguided and led to its demise.
[Online resource]
One common argument against gay marriage, most famously used to defend California’s now defunct Proposition 8, is that marriage exists solely for a couple to have and raise children, thereby implying that biological parents are best for child welfare. Using his research into adopted parenting outcomes, Kyle Gibson argues that same-sex couples actually make excellent parents because they must put additional thought and effort into getting children in the first place. He concludes that if the advocates of Proposition 8 are truly concerned with reproduction and childrearing, they are left without a valid argument.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 30 Jul 2014 09:51 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/58492 |
Downloads