Postal voting and electoral fraud: a reply to Richard Mawrey QC
James, T. S.
(2014).
Postal voting and electoral fraud: a reply to Richard Mawrey QC.
Postal votes have long been a source of suspicion, with allegations of fraud seemingly never far away. But while recent allegations by Richard Marrey QC should be taken seriously, it is not in reality a particularly widespread problem, nor something which routinely effects the results of important elections. More serious, argues Toby S. James, is the continuing problem of under-registration and disengagement with the political system, which could be further reinforced by the removal of the postal voting option.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2014 Democratic Audit UK |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 07 Jul 2014 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/57534 |
Explore Further
- HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
- JA Political science (General)
- JN101 Great Britain
- http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=3646 (Publisher)
- http://www.democraticaudit.com/ (Official URL)