How should we aggregate competing claims?
Voorhoeve, A.
(2014).
How should we aggregate competing claims?
Ethics,
125(1), 64 - 87.
https://doi.org/10.1086/677022
Many believe that we ought to save a large number from being permanently bedridden rather than save one from death. Many also believe that we ought to save one from death rather than a multitude from a very minor harm, no matter how large this multitude. I argue that a principle I call “Aggregate Relevant Claims” satisfactorily explains these judgments. I offer a rationale for this principle and defend it against objections.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2014 by The University of Chicago |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
| DOI | 10.1086/677022 |
| Date Deposited | 27 Feb 2014 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/55883 |
Explore Further
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/cpnss/people/alex-voorhoeve.aspx (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84924100390 (Scopus publication)
- http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/journals/journal... (Official URL)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-3835