Reply to Crisp
Otsuka, M. & Voorhoeve, A.
(2011).
Reply to Crisp.
Utilitas,
23(1), 109-114.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081000049X
(2011).
Reply to Crisp.
Utilitas,
23(1), 109-114.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081000049X
We are grateful for, but unconvinced by, Roger Crisp's defence of the Priority View against our critique. In this reply, we show that Crisp fails to grapple with, much less defeat, the central claim of our critique. We also show that an example that Crisp offers in support of the Priority View in fact lends support to our critique of that view.