Scholars should not just assume that populism is bad for democracy, but should instead concentrate on explaining populism’s positive and negative effects
Rovira Kaltwasser, C.
(2012).
Scholars should not just assume that populism is bad for democracy, but should instead concentrate on explaining populism’s positive and negative effects.
With the rise of technocratic government in the wake of the eurocrisis, many now argue that populism is bad for democracy. Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser argues that this view is wrong-headed, and that there is no cross-regional research into the impacts of populism on democracy. Academics now need to focus on further empirical investigations into populism and its effects on liberal democracies, which may be positive or negative.
| Item Type | Online resource |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2012 The Author |
| Departments | LSE |
| Date Deposited | 09 May 2013 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/50146 |
Explore Further
- http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2012/10/15/populism-and-liberal-democracy/ (Publisher)
- http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/ (Official URL)