Is distance dying at last?
Griffith, R., Lee, S. & Van Reenen, J.
(2008).
Is distance dying at last?
Centrepiece,
12(3), 6-10.
https://doi.org/CEPCP240
Economists have long been sceptical of claims about the 'death of distance' - the idea that new technology has diminished the significance of geography for economic outcomes. Research by Sokbae Lee, Rachel Griffith and John Van Reenen, which looks at patent citations over a quarter of a century, finds the first hard evidence that distance is indeed becoming less important. Their study finds that measured by the relative speed of patent citations over time, the flow of ideas between countries is getting quicker. If new ideas are benefiting other countries more quickly, it may make less sense to subsidise corporate R&D.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2008 Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science |
| Departments |
LSE > Research Centres > Centre for Economic Performance LSE > Academic Departments > Economics |
| DOI | CEPCP240 |
| Date Deposited | 02 May 2008 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/4595 |
Explore Further
- O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
- O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
- F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
- http://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/abstract.asp?index=3117 (Publisher)
- http://cep.lse.ac.uk/centrepiece (Official URL)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-2907