Do matching frictions explain unemployment?: not in bad times
Michaillat, P.
(2012).
Do matching frictions explain unemployment?: not in bad times.
American Economic Review,
102(4), 1721-1750.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1721
This paper models unemployment as the result of matching frictions and job rationing. Job rationing is a shortage of jobs arising naturally in an economic equilibrium from the combination of some wage rigidity and diminishing marginal returns to labor. During recessions, job rationing is acute, driving the rise in unemployment, whereas matching frictions contribute little to unemployment. Intuitively, in recessions jobs are lacking, the labor market is slack, recruiting is easy and inexpensive, so matching frictions do not matter much. In a calibrated model, cyclical fluctuations in the composition of unemployment are quantitatively large.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2012 American Economic Association |
| Departments |
LSE > Academic Departments > Economics LSE > Research Centres > Centre for Economic Performance |
| DOI | 10.1257/aer.102.4.1721 |
| Date Deposited | 20 Feb 2012 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/41957 |
Explore Further
- E24 - Macroeconomics: Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution (includes wage indexation)
- E32 - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
- J41 - Contracts: Specific Human Capital, Matching Models, Efficiency Wage Models, and Internal Labor Markets
- J64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84862591397 (Scopus publication)
- http://www.aeaweb.org/ (Official URL)