Rawls and realism
Gledhill, James
(2012)
Rawls and realism
Social Theory and Practice, 38 (1).
pp. 55-82.
ISSN 0037-802X
Political realists like Bernard Williams and Raymond Geuss reject political moralism, where ideal ethical theory comes first, then applied principles, and politics is reduced to a kind of applied ethics. While the models of political moralism that Williams criticizes are endorsed by G.A. Cohen and Ronald Dworkin respectively, I argue that this realist case against John Rawls cannot be sustained. In explicating and defending Rawls’s realistically utopian conception of ideal theory I defend a Kantian conception of theory where it is by abstracting from immediate realities that theory is fit to guide practice by providing a framework for political judgment.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2012 Florida State University |
| Departments | Government |
| Date Deposited | 22 Mar 2012 12:36 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/41899 |
Explore Further
- http://stp.philosophy.fsu.edu/index2.html (Publisher)
- http://stp.philosophy.fsu.edu/ (Official URL)