Personalisation through individual budgets: does it work and for whom?
In England, ‘personal budgets’ are being implemented at a time of financial austerity. They are part of a growing trend internationally to give users of publicly funded social care and support more choice and control. In the individual budgets' (IB) pilot, people were allocated and had control over the way their IB was managed and spent, offering the opportunity to explore the potential of IBs to deliver better outcomes for people than conventional services and support. We describe the way we measured outcomes, the effects we found and how they varied between and within service user groups. For some groups, there were clear benefits from IBs. However, it should not be a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach, and, in taking personal budgets forward, it is important to consider how best to address the particular challenges for older people, effects on social work practice and resource implications if the potential benefits are to be achieved. Social workers may find themselves implementing a policy with considerable potential, but which may prove very difficult to achieve in the current financial climate.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2011 Oxford University Press |
| Departments |
LSE > Academic Departments > Social Policy LSE > Research Centres > Care Policy and Evaluation Centre |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjsw/bcr159 |
| Date Deposited | 02 Dec 2011 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/39869 |
Explore Further
- HB Economic Theory
- HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
- RA Public aspects of medicine
- I18 - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
- I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/health-policy/people/martin-knapp.aspx (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84871220074 (Scopus publication)
- http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/ (Official URL)