Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics
There are two sources of inconsistency in existing cross-country empirical work on growth: correlated individual effects and endogenous explanatory variables. We estimate a variety of cross-country growth regressions using a generalized method of moments estimator that eliminates both problems. In one application, we find that per capita incomes converge to their steady-state levels at a rate of approximately 10 percent per year. This result stands in sharp contrast to the current consensus, which places the convergence rate at 2 percent. We discuss the theoretical implications of this finding. In another application, we perform a test of the Solow model. Again, contrary to prior reults, we reject both the standard and the augmented version of the model.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers |
| Departments |
LSE > Research Centres > Centre for Economic Performance LSE > Academic Departments > Economics |
| DOI | 10.1007/BF00141044 |
| Date Deposited | 29 Mar 2008 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/3949 |
Explore Further
- O47 - Measurement of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output (Income) Convergence
- O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/economics/people/faculty/francesco-caselli (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0011060066 (Scopus publication)
- https://link.springer.com/journal/10887 (Official URL)