In defense of usury laws
Coco, G. & de Meza, D.
(2009).
In defense of usury laws.
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,
41(8), 1691-1703.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00274.x
Usury law is often criticized by economists for curtailing lending and thus creating deadweight costs. This paper shows that if moral hazard leads to credit rationing, a just-binding usury law creates a deadweight gain. This property also holds in most market-clearing equilibria. Independent of social insurance benefits, or curbing present-biased preferences, interest rate caps have merit.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2009 The Ohio State University |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Management |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00274.x |
| Date Deposited | 10 May 2011 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/36071 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/70449363977 (Scopus publication)
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(IS... (Official URL)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-8310