Biases in the healthcare luxury good hypothesis?: a meta-regression analysis
Although a growing literature examining the relationship between income and health expenditures suggests that healthcare is a luxury good, this conclusion is debatable owing to heterogeneity of the existing results. The paper tests the luxury good hypothesis (namely that income elasticity exceeds 1) by using meta-regression analysis, taking into consideration publication selection and aggregation bias. The findings suggest that publication bias exists, which is a result that is robust to the meta-regression model employed. Publication selection and aggregation bias also appear to play a role in the generation of estimates. The corrected estimates of income elasticity range from 0.4 to 0.8, which cast serious doubt on the validity of the luxury good hypothesis.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Aggregate health expenditure; Healthcare; Income elasticity; Luxury goods; Meta-regression analysis; Regional health expenditure |
| Departments |
Social Policy European Institute LSE Health Health Policy |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00653.x |
| Date Deposited | 11 Aug 2010 12:37 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/28989 |