Biases in the healthcare luxury good hypothesis?: a meta-regression analysis
Although a growing literature examining the relationship between income and health expenditures suggests that healthcare is a luxury good, this conclusion is debatable owing to heterogeneity of the existing results. The paper tests the luxury good hypothesis (namely that income elasticity exceeds 1) by using meta-regression analysis, taking into consideration publication selection and aggregation bias. The findings suggest that publication bias exists, which is a result that is robust to the meta-regression model employed. Publication selection and aggregation bias also appear to play a role in the generation of estimates. The corrected estimates of income elasticity range from 0.4 to 0.8, which cast serious doubt on the validity of the luxury good hypothesis.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2010 Royal Statistical Society |
| Departments |
LSE > Academic Departments > Social Policy LSE > Academic Departments > European Institute LSE > Research Centres > LSE Health LSE > Academic Departments > Health Policy |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00653.x |
| Date Deposited | 11 Aug 2010 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/28989 |
Explore Further
- http://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/people/academic-staff/costa-i-font-joan/home.aspx (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78650869183 (Scopus publication)
- http://www.rss.org.uk/main.asp?page=3003 (Official URL)