Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social banking experiment
Lack of access to finance is often cited as a key reason why poor people remain poor. This paper uses data on the Indian rural branch expansion program to provide empirial evidence on this issue. Between 1977 and 1990, the Indian Central Bank mandated that a commercial bank can open a branch in a location with one or more bank branches only if it opens four in locations with no bank branches. We show that between 1977 and 1990 this rule caused banks to open relatively more rural branches in Indian states with lower initial financial development. The reverse is true outside this period. We exploit this fact to identify the impact of opening a rural bank on poverty and output. Our estimates suggest that the Indian rural branch expansion program significantly lowered rural poverty, and increased non-agricultural output.
| Item Type | Working paper |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2003 the authors |
| Departments |
LSE > Academic Departments > Economics LSE > Research Centres > STICERD |
| Date Deposited | 27 Apr 2007 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/2244 |
Explore Further
- N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions
- O1 - Economic Development
- O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
- I3 - Welfare and Poverty
- E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
- H1 - Structure and Scope of Government
- H4 - Publicly Provided Goods
- G2 - Financial Institutions and Services
- O2 - Development Planning and Policy
- http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk (Official URL)