Majority voting on restricted domains
In judgment aggregation, unlike preference aggregation, not much is known about domain restrictions that guarantee consistent majority outcomes. We introduce several conditions on individual judgments su¢ - cient for consistent majority judgments. Some are based on global orders of propositions or individuals, others on local orders, still others not on orders at all. Some generalize classic social-choice-theoretic domain conditions, others have no counterpart. Our most general condition gen- eralizes Sen’s triplewise value-restriction, itself the most general classic condition. We also prove a new characterization theorem: for a large class of domains, if there exists any aggregation function satisfying some democratic conditions, then majority voting is the unique such function. Taken together, our results provide new support for the robustness of majority rule.
| Item Type | Working paper |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2007 Franz Dietrich and Christian List |
| Departments |
LSE > Academic Departments > Government LSE > Academic Departments > Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method LSE > Research Centres > Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences (CPNSS) |
| Date Deposited | 29 Jul 2008 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/20114 |
Explore Further
- http://personal.lse.ac.uk/list/default.htm (Official URL)