Entry and asymmetric lobbying: why governments pick losers
Baldwin, R. E. & Robert-Nicoud, F.
(2007).
Entry and asymmetric lobbying: why governments pick losers.
(CEPDP 791).
London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
Governments frequently intervene to support domestic industries, but a surprising amount of this support goes to ailing sectors. We explain this with a lobbying model that allows for entry and sunk costs. Specifically, policy is influenced by pressure groups that incur lobbying expenses to create rents. In expanding industries, entry tends to erode such rents, but in declining industries, sunk costs rule out entry as long as the rents are not too high. This asymmetric appropriability of rents means losers lobby harder. Thus it is not that government policy picks losers, it is that losers pick government policy.
| Item Type | Working paper |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2007 the authors |
| Departments |
LSE > Research Centres > Centre for Economic Performance LSE > Academic Departments > Geography and Environment |
| Date Deposited | 21 Jul 2008 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/19726 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/35148827550 (Scopus publication)
- http://cep.lse.ac.uk (Official URL)