Toward integrating subjective well-being in environmental health impact assessments for healthy urban living: a conceptual and methodological exploration

Chen, X., Hoek, G., Frijters, P., Dyer, G. M. C., Gössling, S., Khomenko, S., Khreis, H., Kolb, E., Mueller, N., Staatsen, B., +7 more...Vasconcelos, print., Resendes, D. S., van Kempen, E., White, M. P., Vermeulen, R., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. & Gehring, U. (2026). Toward integrating subjective well-being in environmental health impact assessments for healthy urban living: a conceptual and methodological exploration. Environment International, 208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110067
Copy

Abstract

Environmental Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) can inform decisions about the health effects of policy-related changes in environmental exposures. Conventional health impact metrics, focusing on mortality, morbidity, and disability, neglect subjective well-being. We explored the need and feasibility of integrating well-being indicators such as happiness and life satisfaction into quantitative environmental HIAs. Building on a multidisciplinary expert workshop and existing literature, we addressed (1) definitions and indicators of well-being, (2) pathways linking environmental exposures (air pollution, noise, extreme temperatures, and green space) to well-being, and (3) the strength of epidemiological evidence for these associations. We evaluated the challenges of integrating well-being indicators into environmental HIAs, and provided an exploratory example. We argue that including well-being in HIAs offers a more comprehensive view of health, aligning with policy goals focused on enhancing citizen's well-being. The literature identifies plausible pathways linking exposures to well-being, whilst epidemiological evidence for associations between environmental exposures and well-being is limited, but suggestive. We propose conducting exploratory HIAs integrating well-being, especially for green space (n = 16 epidemiological studies) and air pollution (n = 18). We outline two practical integration strategies: (1) report well-being impacts separately as Well-being-Adjusted Life Years, and (2) incorporate well-being into existing health indicators such as Quality-Adjusted Life Years or Disability-Adjusted Life Years. Inclusion of well-being into quantitative environmental HIAs presents a more comprehensive representation of health and well-being beyond indicators focusing on morbidity and mortality. However, the epidemiological evidence base regarding environmental exposures and well-being warrants further expansion. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.]

picture_as_pdf

subject
Published Version
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

Download

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager (RIS) Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export