Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: challenging core assumptions

Allan, J. I., Borthakur, A., Kinninburgh, F., Petersmann, M., Balayannis, A., Barry, A., Beck, S., Elliott, K., Forsyth, T.ORCID logo, Hardon, A., +5 more...Hughes, H., Macnaghten, P., Selin, H., Sun, Y. & Vadrot, A. (2025). Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: challenging core assumptions. Global Environmental Change, 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995
Copy

Negotiations are ongoing but fraught for designing a new global science-policy panel for chemicals and waste pollution. In this Perspectives article, we challenge three assumptions guiding these negotiations. First, the new panel should resemble the existing panels of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Second, the creation of a new panel will automatically carry authority within policymaking. Third, the participation of industry is crucial without special consideration for its interests. Further, we identify three steps to enhance the panel’s relevance and influence.

picture_as_pdf

subject
Published Version
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

Download

Export as

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core JSON Multiline CSV
Export