Conflict of interest disclosure in oncology:preliminary insights from the Global ONCOTRUST-1 cross-sectional study

El Bairi, Khalid; Najem, Salma; Chowdhury, Arman Reza; Omar, Abeid; Abdihamid, Omar; Teuwen, Laure-Anne; Benhima, Nada; Madariaga, Ainhoa; Elkefi, Safa; Diaz, Fernando Cristobal; +9 more...Hussain, Sadaqat; Jenei, Kristina; Hammad, Nazik; Mutebi, Miriam; Rubagumya, Fidel; Trapani, Dario; El Kadmiri, Nadia; Laouali, Nasser; and Fourtassi, Maryam (2024) Conflict of interest disclosure in oncology:preliminary insights from the Global ONCOTRUST-1 cross-sectional study JCO Global Oncology, 10: e2400167. ISSN 2687-8941
Copy

Purpose Conflicts of interest (COIs) between oncologists and industry might considerably influence how the presentation of the research results is delivered, ultimately affecting clinical decisions and policy-making. Although there are many regulations on reporting COI in high-income countries (HICs), little is known about their reporting in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Oncology Transparency Under Scrutiny and Tracking (ONCOTRUST-1) is a pilot global survey to explore the knowledge and perceptions of oncologists regarding COI. Materials and Methods We designed an online 27-question–based survey in the English language to explore the perceptions and knowledge of oncologists regarding COI, with an emphasis on LMICs. Descriptive statistics and the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines were used to report the findings. Results ONCOTRUST-1 surveyed 200 oncologists, 70.9% of them practicing in LMICs. Median age of the respondents was 36 (range, 26-84) years; 47.5% of them were women. Of the respondents, 40.5% reported weekly visits by pharmaceutical representatives to their institutions. Regarding oncologists' perceptions of COI that require disclosure, direct financial benefits, such as honoraria, ranked highest (58.5%), followed by gifts from pharmaceutical representatives (50%) and travel grants for attending conferences (44.5%). By contrast, personal or institutional research funding, sample drugs, consulting or advisory board, expert testimony, and food and beverage funded by pharmaceutical industry were less frequently considered as COI. Moreover, only 24% of surveyed oncologists could correctly categorize all situations representing a COI. Conclusion These findings underscore the importance of clear guidelines, education, and transparency in reporting COI in oncology. This hypothesis-generating pilot survey provided the rationale for ONCOTRUST-2 study, which will compare perceptions of COI among oncologists in LMICs and HICs.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation METS MODS RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads