The political leeway in policymaking: from Neurathian underdetermination to the precautionary principle
In this paper, I propose and develop the Auxiliary Principle (AP), which states that given the endemic uncertainty in policymaking, decision-makers always have political leeway in their choices, and that they should a cknowled geit as such. First, I explain the ideas of Otto Neurath, whose writings on decision-making in conditions of epistemic uncertainty and whose proposal of an ‘auxiliary motive’ inspired my AP. Next, I explain the AP in-depth, including what its assumptions are and what its purpose is in decision-making under uncertainty: making the responsibility of political decision-making explicit in democratic discourse. Finally, I argue that the AP can be a useful substitution for the popular Precautionary Principle at the meta-level while preserving its risk-averse intuitions. I use the controversy around the regulation of the AstraZeneca vaccine for Covid-19 to illustrate my arguments.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2024 Edizioni ETS |
| Departments |
LSE > Academic Departments > European Institute LSE > Academic Departments > Government |
| DOI | 10.4454/k0rwee48 |
| Date Deposited | 05 Jul 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | 09 Jan 2024 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/124113 |
Explore Further
- https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=lse-pure-import-candidates&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001250107100009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/people/erspamer-melanie (Author)
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202758545 (Scopus publication)
