Social science is explanation or it is nothing.” Introduction to a debate
This essay introduces contributions to a special section, which documents and extends a debate on the proposition “Social Science is Explanation or it is Nothing” held at the London School of Economics on October 13 th, 2022. It discusses the history of the “Group for Theoretical Debates in Anthropology” led by Tim Ingold, Peter Wade and Soumhya Venkatesan, which has handed down a list of credible candidates for issues that had a chance of engaging every anthropologist, including students and those with interdisciplinary interests. It raises questions about the specific affordances of debates as forms of academic engagements. It argues that the chosen proposition concerning explanation invites a discussion about the contributions of the social sciences at a time when impulses from science and technology studies as well as fruitful exchanges across the boundary between “theory” and “method” have helped us moved beyond the older question as to whether or not sociology is “a science”.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords | critique,debating,description,explanation,philosophy of science,sociology of the social sciences |
| Departments | Sociology |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-4446.13100 |
| Date Deposited | 01 May 2024 23:16 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/122868 |
Explore Further
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/sociology/people/monika-krause (Author)
- http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204501776&partnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus publication)
- 10.1111/1468-4446.13100 (DOI)
