National immunization program decision making using the CAPACITI decision-support tool: user feedback from Indonesia and Ethiopia
To ensure that limited domestic resources are invested in the most effective interventions, immunization programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) must prioritize a growing number of new vaccines while considering opportunities to optimize the vaccine portfolio, as well as other components of the health system. There is a strong impetus for immunization decision-making to engage and coordinate various stakeholders across the health system in prioritization. To address this, national immunization program decision-makers in LMICs collaborated with WHO to structure deliberation among stakeholders and document an evidence-based, context-specific, and transparent process for prioritization or selection among multiple vaccination products, services, or strategies. The output of this effort is the Country-led Assessment for Prioritization on Immunization (CAPACITI) decision-support tool, which supports using multiple criteria and stakeholder perspectives to evaluate trade-offs affecting health interventions, taking into account variable data quality. Here, we describe the user feedback from Indonesia and Ethiopia, two initial countries that piloted the CAPACITI decision-support tool, highlighting enabling and constraining factors. Potential immunization program benefits and lessons learned are also summarized for consideration in other settings.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2024 The Authors |
| Departments | LSE |
| DOI | 10.3390/vaccines12030337 |
| Date Deposited | 12 Apr 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | 06 Mar 2024 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/122624 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85189134646 (Scopus publication)
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/social-policy/people/research-students/Dijana-Spasenoska (Author)
- https://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccines (Official URL)
