Brexit – the EU membership crisis that wasn’t?
This introduction to the special issue recalls the alarm raised in EU capitals and Brussels after the UK’s in-out referendum delivered a Leave vote in June 2016. The fear was of a domino effect and the further fragmentation of an already divided EU. Seven years later, it is clear that there was rapid attrition of Eurosceptic triumphalism, and the EU-27 showed remarkable unity. This required a sustained collective effort to contain a membership crisis and maintain the EU polity. Yet, the issue contributors challenge the notion that the alarm was unfounded and explain why this counter-factual did not materialise, even though potential for future membership crises of different sorts was revealed. Theoretically, this supports an understanding of the EU as a polity that is fragile, yet able to assert porous borders, exercise authority over a diverse membership, and mobilise a modicum of loyalty when the entire integration regime is under threat.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 2024 The Author(s) |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > European Institute |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402382.2024.2325780 |
| Date Deposited | 08 Apr 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | 01 Jan 2024 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/122563 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85188915045 (Scopus publication)
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/people/Schelkle-Waltraud (Author)
- https://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/people/ganderson-joseph (Author)
- https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/fwep20 (Official URL)
