Correction: Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial
Roos, R., Witteveen, A. B., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Barbui, C., Bryant, R. A., Felez-Nobrega, M., Figueiredo, N., Kalisch, R., Haro, J. M., McDaid, D.
, +10 more...Mediavilla, R., Melchior, M., Nicaise, P., Park, A., Petri-Romão, P., Purgato, M., Van Straten, A., Tedeschi, F., Underhill, J. & Sijbrandij, M.
(2024).
Correction: Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial.
BMC Psychiatry,
24(1), p. 24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05475-4
, +10 more...Mediavilla, R., Melchior, M., Nicaise, P., Park, A., Petri-Romão, P., Purgato, M., Van Straten, A., Tedeschi, F., Underhill, J. & Sijbrandij, M.
(2024).
Correction: Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial.
BMC Psychiatry,
24(1), p. 24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05475-4
Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors identified that the sentence under the subheading Sample size was incorrect. The correct sentence is given below. The incorrect sentence is: Power calculations suggested a minimum sample size of 74 per group (power = 0.80, α = 0.05, two-sided). The correct sentence is: Power calculations suggested a minimum sample size of 74 per group (power = 0.95, α = 0.05, two-sided). The original article [1] has been corrected.
