Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism
Wells, A. J.
(1999).
Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
22(5), 911-912.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9951220X
Lifelines discusses two approaches to biology, “ultra-Darwinism” which Rose criticises, and the “homeodynamic perspective,” which he offers as an alternative. This review suggests that ultra-Darwinism is a caricature of the theoretical positions Rose wishes to oppose and that the homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative, but is complementary to so-called ultra-Darwinism.
| Item Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright holders | © 1999 Cambridge University Press |
| Departments | LSE > Academic Departments > Psychological and Behavioural Science |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0140525X9951220X |
| Date Deposited | 13 Feb 2010 |
| URI | https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/12103 |
Explore Further
- https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033393704 (Scopus publication)
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna... (Official URL)